- Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: The Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II
- Featured Publications
- All Publications
Alternatives : HTML JSON YAML text N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix dbpedia_owl: <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/> . @prefix gcis: <http://data.globalchange.gov/gcis.owl#> . @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . <https://data.globalchange.gov/activity/noaa-led-state-summaries-2017-ut-projected-change-in-winter-precipitation-process> dcterms:identifier "noaa-led-state-summaries-2017-ut-projected-change-in-winter-precipitation-process"; ## Duration of the activity dcterms:extent [ rdf:value "9 hours and 30 minutes"^^xsd:string ] ; ## Output datafiles dbpedia_owl:filename "CICS computer cluster /snfs4/assessment/state summaries"^^xsd:string; ## Computing environment gcis:computingEnvironmentsUsed "Linux (CentOS release 6.4)"^^xsd:string; ## assignment of responsibility to an agent for an activity, indicating that the agent ## had a role in the activity. It further allows for a plan to be specified, which is ## the plan intended by the agent to achieve some goals in the context of this activity. prov:qualifiedAssociation [ a prov:Association ; prov:agent [ a prov:SoftwareAgent, gcis:Software ; rdfs:label "Fortran 95,f95 compiler,GrADS,ArcGIS"^^xsd:string; ] ; prov:hadPlan [ a prov:Plan; rdf:value "1. For each model at each grid point, the mean winter precipitation under the RCP8.5 scenario was calculated.<br/>2. For each model, these data were re-gridded to a common grid.<br/>3. For each model at each grid point, the mean winter precipitation under the RCP8.5 scenario was calculated for two periods: 1971-2000 and 2041-2070.<br/>4. At each grid point, the difference in projected winter precipitation was calculated for 2041-2070 minus 1971-2000.<br/>5. At each grid point, the mean winter precipitation difference was computed by averaging the following models:<br/>BCC-CSM1.1, CCSM4, CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, FIO-ESM, GFDL-CM3, GFDL-ESM2G, GFDL-ESM2M, GISS-E2-R, HadGEM2-A0, HadGEM2-ES, IPSL-CM5B-LR, IPSL-CM5A-LR, MIROC5, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, MIROC-ESM, MRI-CGCM3.<br/>6. Data were plotted for grid points in the contiguous United States with model agreement indicated as follows:<br/>Category 1: If less than 50% of the models indicate a statistically significant change then the multi-model mean is shown in color;<br/>Category 2: If more than 50% of the models indicate a statistically significant change but less than 67% of the significant models agree on the sign of the change, then the grid points are masked out;<br/>Category 3: If more than 50% of the models indicate a statistically significant change and more than 67% of the significant models agree on the sign of the change, then the multimodel mean is shown in color with hatching."^^xsd:string; ] ; ] ; a prov:Activity . ## The following entity was derived from a dataset using this activity <https://data.globalchange.gov/report/noaa-led-state-summaries-2017/chapter/utah/figure/ut-projected-change-in-winter-precipitation> prov:wasDerivedFrom <https://data.globalchange.gov/dataset/nca3-cmip5-r1>; prov:wasGeneratedBy <https://data.globalchange.gov/activity/noaa-led-state-summaries-2017-ut-projected-change-in-winter-precipitation-process>.