reference : Reliability of regional climate model trends

JSON YAML text HTML Turtle N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
/reference/c4a62064-fc9c-4ab6-a648-dd4e12ddfe95
Bibliographic fields
reftype Journal Article
Abstract A necessary condition for a good probabilistic forecast is that the forecast system is shown to be reliable: forecast probabilities should equal observed probabilities verified over a large number of cases. As climate change trends are now emerging from the natural variability, we can apply this concept to climate predictions and compute the reliability of simulated local and regional temperature and precipitation trends (1950–2011) in a recent multi-model ensemble of climate model simulations prepared for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report (AR5). With only a single verification time, the verification is over the spatial dimension. The local temperature trends appear to be reliable. However, when the global mean climate response is factored out, the ensemble is overconfident: the observed trend is outside the range of modelled trends in many more regions than would be expected by the model estimate of natural variability and model spread. Precipitation trends are overconfident for all trend definitions. This implies that for near-term local climate forecasts the CMIP5 ensemble cannot simply be used as a reliable probabilistic forecast.
Author van Oldenborgh, G. J.; Doblas Reyes, F. J.; S. S. Drijfhout; E. Hawkins
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014055
Issue 1
Journal Environmental Research Letters
Pages 014055
Title Reliability of regional climate model trends
Volume 8
Year 2013
Bibliographic identifiers
.reference_type 0
_record_number 19675
_uuid c4a62064-fc9c-4ab6-a648-dd4e12ddfe95