reference : Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: Adaptive governance and connectivity conservation

JSON YAML text HTML Turtle N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
/reference/e71a2e9d-2c9e-4b1d-9111-c707394a3024
Bibliographic fields
reftype Journal Article
Abstract Effective adaptive governance will emerge from strong relationships between science, governance, and practice. However, these relationships receive scant critical attention among adaptive governance scholarship. To address this lacuna, Jasanoff’s “idiom of coproduction” provides a lens to view the dialectical relationships between science and society. This view sees science and governance as coevolving through iterative relationships between the material, cognitive, social, and normative dimensions of a problem. This coevolution is precisely the aspiration of adaptive governance; however, the notion of coproduction must be grounded to provide practical guidance for groups aspiring to “govern adaptively.” I have drawn on three concepts, namely coproduction, bridging/boundary organizations, and adaptive capacity, to present a conceptual framework of “coproductive capacities.” Coproductive capacities are the material, cognitive, social, and normative capacities that enable groups of actors to connect knowledge with action in a cross-scale governance context. This framework was applied to two cases of connectivity conservation. Inspired by the science of conservation biology, connectivity conservation promotes collaborative, cross-scale governance to conserve biodiversity at a landscape scale. This tight coupling of science and governance in a cross-scale context makes connectivity conservation a classic case of both coproduction and adaptive governance. However, the inability of the initiatives in the cases examined to turn their visions into action highlights a critical absence of key capacities. In particular, challenges faced in connecting knowledge with action at various scales points to the importance of building relationships between actors across scales. The structures and mechanisms of governance have dominated adaptive governance scholarship, yet coproductive capacity and adaptive governance emerge from the relationships between actors seeking to connect knowledge with action. Building capacity to negotiate these relationships is a more fruitful focus for adaptive governance than design principles and diagnostics.
Article Number 11
Author Wyborn, Carina A.
DOI 10.5751/ES-06510-200111
Issue 1
Journal Ecology and Society
Keywords adaptive capacity; adaptive governance; boundary organizations; bridging organizations; connectivity conservation; coproduction; coproductive capacities
Pages 11
Publisher The Resilience Alliance
Title Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: Adaptive governance and connectivity conservation
Volume 20
Year 2015
Bibliographic identifiers
_record_number 22356
_uuid e71a2e9d-2c9e-4b1d-9111-c707394a3024