- Climate Science Special Report: The Fourth National Climate Assessment: Volume I
- Featured Publications
- All Publications
finding 3.2 : key-finding-3-2
The science of event attribution is rapidly advancing through improved understanding of the mechanisms that produce extreme events and the marked progress in development of methods that are used for event attribution (high confidence).
This finding is from chapter 3 of Climate Science Special Report: The Fourth National Climate Assessment: Volume I.
Process for developing key messages: Owing to the improved physical understanding of extreme weather and climate events as the science in these fields progress, and owing to the high promise of newly developed methods for exploring the roles of different influences on occurrence of extreme events, there is high confidence that the science of event attribution is rapidly advancing.
Description of evidence base: This Key Finding paraphrases a conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences report2180df56-f5ec-49e5-9733-d61778bf49d1 on attribution of extreme weather events in the context of climate change. That report discusses advancements in event attribution in more detail than possible here due to space limitations. Weather and climate science in general continue to seek improved physical understanding of extreme weather events. One aspect of improved understanding is the ability to more realistically simulate extreme weather events in models, as the models embody current physical understanding in a simulation framework that can be tested on sample cases. NAS2180df56-f5ec-49e5-9733-d61778bf49d1 provides references to studies that evaluate weather and climate models used to simulated extreme events in a climate context. Such models can include coupled climate models (e.g., Taylor et al. 2012;29dec54f-92a8-4543-93f1-941da4f4d750 Flato et al. 2013a46eaad1-5c17-46f7-bba6-d3fee718a092), atmospheric models with specified sea surface temperatures, regional models for dynamical downscaling, weather forecasting models, or statistical downscaling models. Appendix C includes a brief description of the evolving set of methods used for event attribution, discussed in more detail in references such as NAS,2180df56-f5ec-49e5-9733-d61778bf49d1 Hulme,c94faf72-2d6d-46dc-a432-1d34a24b4d5f Trenberth et al.,cedf32db-4b9f-401a-b69e-2b8eb5457389 Shepherd,0c07ed76-7acf-4e78-840b-df6c232acb27 Horton et al.,4d446ea9-dfd2-45e6-aca4-56e6f85ffa58 Hannart,dc720443-bc58-4fd7-bb36-19f8f5743293 and Hannart et al.ce628e6b-5e45-4ab9-b288-ac5d93256c26 81ca1b2d-040c-4fd0-aa50-8290a8e25893 Most of this methodology as applied to extreme weather and climate event attribution, has evolved since the European heat wave study of Stott et al.95994754-90b8-4fac-b8a8-0c135f7a2e02
New information and remaining uncertainties: While the science of event attribution is rapidly advancing, studies of individual events will typically contain caveats. In some cases, attribution statements are made without a clear detection of an anthropogenic influence on observed occurrences of events similar to the one in question, so that there is reliance on models to assess probabilities of occurrence. In such cases there will typically be uncertainties in the model-based estimations of the anthropogenic influence, in the estimation of the influence of natural variability on the event’s occurrence, and even in the observational records related to the event (e.g., long-term records of hurricane occurrence). Despite these uncertainties in individual attribution studies, the science of event attribution is advancing through increased physical understanding and development of new methods of attribution and evaluation of models.
Assessment of confidence based on evidence: There is very high confidence that weather and climate science are advancing in their understanding of the physical mechanisms that produce extreme events. For example, hurricane track forecasts have improved in part due to improved models. There is high confidence that new methods being developed will help lead to further advances in the science of event attribution.
Improving science of event attribution has a high likelihood of impact, as it is one means by which scientists can better understand the relationship between occurrence of extreme events and long-term climate change. A further impact will be the improved ability to communicate this information to the public and to policymakers for various uses, including improved adaptation planning.c94faf72-2d6d-46dc-a432-1d34a24b4d5f 2180df56-f5ec-49e5-9733-d61778bf49d1
ProvenanceThis finding was derived from figure -.2: Confidence / Likelihood
- A common framework for approaches to extreme event attribution (0c07ed76)
- Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change (2180df56)
- An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design (29dec54f)
- A review of recent advances in research on extreme heat events (4d446ea9)
- DADA: Data assimilation for the detection and attribution of weather and climate-related events (81ca1b2d)
- Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003 (95994754)
- chapter ipcc-ar5-wg1 chapter 9 : Evaluation of Climate Models (a46eaad1)
- Attributing weather extremes to ‘climate change’ (c94faf72)
- Causal counterfactual theory for the attribution of weather and climate-related events (ce628e6b)
- Attribution of climate extreme events (cedf32db)
- Integrated optimal fingerprinting: Method description and illustration (dc720443)
Alternatives : JSON YAML Turtle N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG