- Climate Science Special Report: The Fourth National Climate Assessment: Volume I
- Featured Publications
- All Publications
Figure : model-spatial-scale-comparison
Model Spatial Comparison
Figure 4.4Texas Tech University, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Anne Marie K. Stoner, Katharine Hayhoe, Keith W. Dixon
This figure appears in chapter 4 of the Climate Science Special Report: The Fourth National Climate Assessment: Volume I report.
CMIP5 global climate models typically operate at coarser horizontal spatial scales on the order of 30 to 200 miles (50 to 300 km), while regional climate models have much finer resolutions, on the order of 6 to 30 miles (10 to 50 km). This figure compares annual average precipitation (in millimeters) for the historical period 1979–2008 using (a) a resolution of 250 km or 150 miles with (b) a resolution of 15 miles or 25 km to illustrate the importance of spatial scale in resolving key topographical features, particularly along the coasts and in mountainous areas. In this case, both simulations are by the GFDL HIRAM, an experimental high-resolution model. (Figure source: adapted from Dixon et al. 2016dedfd6d8-a9f8-41c8-92a7-7426e7e014af ).
Copyright protected. Obtain permission from the original figure source.
This figure was created on October 14, 2016.
This figure was submitted on August 31, 2017.
- Evaluating the stationarity assumption in statistically downscaled climate projections: Is past performance an indicator of future results? (dedfd6d8)
This figure is composed of these images :
Alternatives : JSON YAML Turtle N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG