uri,href,identifier,attrs.Abstract,attrs.Author,attrs.DOI,attrs.Date,attrs.ISSN,attrs.Issue,attrs.Journal,attrs.Pages,attrs.Title,"attrs.Type of Article",attrs.Volume,attrs.Year,attrs._record_number,attrs._uuid,attrs.reftype,child_publication
/reference/228fd414-ca3c-4922-a266-a4d46c307a05,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/228fd414-ca3c-4922-a266-a4d46c307a05,228fd414-ca3c-4922-a266-a4d46c307a05,"Sea level rise is causing shoreline erosion, increased coastal flooding, and marsh vulnerability to the impact of storms. Coastal marshes provide flood abatement, carbon and nutrient sequestration, water quality maintenance, and habitat for fish, shellfish, and wildlife, including species of concern, such as the saltmarsh sparrow (Ammodramus caudacutus). We present a climate change adaptation strategy (CCAS) adopted by scientific, management, and policy stakeholders for managing coastal marshes and enhancing system resiliency. A common adaptive management approach previously used for restoration projects was modified to identify climate-related vulnerabilities and plan climate change adaptive actions. As an example of implementation of the CCAS, we describe the stakeholder plans and management actions the US Fish and Wildlife Service and partners developed to build coastal resiliency in the Narrow River Estuary, RI, in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy. When possible, an experimental BACI (before-after, control-impact) design, described as pre- and post-sampling at the impact site and one or more control sites, was incorporated into the climate change adaptation and implementation plans. Specific climate change adaptive actions and monitoring plans are described and include shoreline stabilization, restoring marsh drainage, increasing marsh elevation, and enabling upland marsh migration. The CCAS provides a framework and methodology for successfully managing coastal systems faced with deteriorating habitat, accelerated sea level rise, and changes in precipitation and storm patterns.","Wigand, Cathleen; Ardito, Thomas; Chaffee, Caitlin; Ferguson, Wenley; Paton, Suzanne; Raposa, Kenneth; Vandemoer, Charles; Watson, Elizabeth",10.1007/s12237-015-0003-y,"May 01",1559-2731,3,"Estuaries and Coasts",682-693,"A climate change adaptation strategy for management of coastal marsh systems","journal article",40,2017,24154,228fd414-ca3c-4922-a266-a4d46c307a05,"Journal Article",/article/10.1007/s12237-015-0003-y
/reference/24c64b47-d6c2-41ac-90bb-0d947e68cbbe,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/24c64b47-d6c2-41ac-90bb-0d947e68cbbe,24c64b47-d6c2-41ac-90bb-0d947e68cbbe,,"Newton Mann, Alyssa; Grifman, Phyllis; Fizi Hart, Juliette",,,1932-7048,2,"Cities and the Environment (CATE)","Article 6","The stakes are rising: Lessons on engaging coastal communities on climate adaptation in Southern California",,10,2017,24011,24c64b47-d6c2-41ac-90bb-0d947e68cbbe,"Journal Article",/article/stakes-are-rising-lessons-on-engaging-coastal-communities-on-climate-adaptation-southern-california
/reference/29960c69-6168-4fb0-9af0-d50bdd91acd3,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/29960c69-6168-4fb0-9af0-d50bdd91acd3,29960c69-6168-4fb0-9af0-d50bdd91acd3,,"Vose, R.S.; D.R. Easterling; K.E. Kunkel; A.N. LeGrande; M.F. Wehner",10.7930/J0N29V45,,,,,185-206,"Temperature Changes in the United States",,,2017,21564,29960c69-6168-4fb0-9af0-d50bdd91acd3,"Book Section",/report/climate-science-special-report/chapter/temperature-change
/reference/2b3fde46-c982-4518-800b-41ac2dca32e9,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/2b3fde46-c982-4518-800b-41ac2dca32e9,2b3fde46-c982-4518-800b-41ac2dca32e9,,"Atkins,",,,,,,various,"Flood Loss Avoidance Benefits of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management. Prepared for U.S. EPA",,,2015,24196,2b3fde46-c982-4518-800b-41ac2dca32e9,Report,/report/flood-loss-avoidance-benefits-green-infrastructure-stormwater-management-prepared-us-epa
/reference/2c101a8e-5899-4423-95b0-79ea996b64df,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/2c101a8e-5899-4423-95b0-79ea996b64df,2c101a8e-5899-4423-95b0-79ea996b64df,,"Moody's,",,,,,,21,"Environmental risks: Evaluating the impact of climate change on US state and local issuers",,,2017,26458,2c101a8e-5899-4423-95b0-79ea996b64df,Report,/report/environmental-risks-evaluating-impact-climate-change-on-us-state-local-issuers
/reference/2c2dfd3f-ff08-437a-b075-7f8259dafadb,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/2c2dfd3f-ff08-437a-b075-7f8259dafadb,2c2dfd3f-ff08-437a-b075-7f8259dafadb,,"Olsen, J. Rolf; Julie Kiang; Reagan Waskom",,,,,,304,"Workshop on Nonstationarity, Hydrologic Frequency Analysis, and Water Management [Boulder, CO]",,,2010,24178,2c2dfd3f-ff08-437a-b075-7f8259dafadb,Report,/report/workshop-on-nonstationarity-hydrologic-frequency-analysis-water-management-boulder-co
/reference/30fa21f9-4b83-4af6-bad0-61684ad53f27,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/30fa21f9-4b83-4af6-bad0-61684ad53f27,30fa21f9-4b83-4af6-bad0-61684ad53f27,,"AWF/AEC/Entergy,",,,,,,11,"Building a Resilient Energy Gulf Coast: Executive Report",,,2010,166,30fa21f9-4b83-4af6-bad0-61684ad53f27,Report,/report/entergy-building-2010
/reference/31bf15ab-c374-4466-8b4c-894a527813cb,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/31bf15ab-c374-4466-8b4c-894a527813cb,31bf15ab-c374-4466-8b4c-894a527813cb,"Sponsored by the Committee on Technical Advancement of ASCE Adapting Infrastructure and Civil Engineering Practice to a Changing Climate presents an accurate discussion of the potential significance of climate change to engineering practice. Although considerable evidence indicates that the climate is changing, significant uncertainty exists regarding the location, timing, and magnitude of this change over the lifetime of infrastructure. Practicing engineers are faced with the dilemma of balancing future needs for engineered infrastructure with the risks posed by the effects of climate change on long-term engineering projects. The gap between climate science and engineering practice somehow must be bridged. This report identifies the technical requirements and civil engineering challenges raised by adaptation to a changing climate. Topics include: review of climate science for engineering practice; incorporating climate science into engineering practice; civil engineering sectors that might be affected by climate change; needs for research, development, and demonstration projects; and summary, conclusions, and recommendations. Three appendixes illustrate different engineering approaches to assessing or preparing for climate change. Practitioners, researchers, educators, and students of civil engineering, as well as government officials and allied professionals, will be fascinated by this discussion of the trade-offs between the expenses of increasing system reliability and the potential costs and consequences of failure to future generations.",,10.1061/9780784479193,,,,,93,"Adapting Infrastructure and Civil Engineering Practice to a Changing Climate",,,2015,24558,31bf15ab-c374-4466-8b4c-894a527813cb,"Edited Report",/report/adapting-infrastructure-civil-engineering-practice-changing-climate
/reference/31e5ede2-090f-4240-bbb7-598afdd35a49,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/31e5ede2-090f-4240-bbb7-598afdd35a49,31e5ede2-090f-4240-bbb7-598afdd35a49,"Snapshot views of environmental policy integration (EPI) practices fail to consider the stability of EPI over time – both as aspiration and performance. This paper reviews the evolution of EPI over more than two decades at the national level in the agriculture and energy sectors in Sweden – an EPI pioneer. We study how the extent of EPI stability can be explained partly by shifting political priorities by governments and partly by underlying governance models (actors and organizational landscape and policy instruments used). Comparing the two sectors, the institutionalization of EPI appears to be stronger in the energy sector. In the agricultural sector, the current reform of the Common Agricultural Policy seems to imply decreasing prominence of EPI – due to shrinking budgets for environmental targets along with greater policy goals complexity. Overall, observed shifts in governance have been mildly conducive to EPI by providing an infrastructure, but further enhancements require clear political priority awarded to the environment.","Persson, Åsa; Eckerberg, Katarina; Nilsson, Måns",10.1177/0263774x15614726,,,3,"Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",478-495,"Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden",,34,2016,26463,31e5ede2-090f-4240-bbb7-598afdd35a49,"Journal Article",/article/10.1177/0263774x15614726
/reference/32420d63-0809-483b-abf5-453acdc6d168,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/32420d63-0809-483b-abf5-453acdc6d168,32420d63-0809-483b-abf5-453acdc6d168,,"Nelson, D.R.
Adger, W.N.
Brown, K.",10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348,,,,"Annual Review of Environment and Resources",395-419,"Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework",,32,2007,2194,32420d63-0809-483b-abf5-453acdc6d168,"Journal Article",/article/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
/reference/35f9d6f9-e40b-4f51-9cf2-94e4052d7d88,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/35f9d6f9-e40b-4f51-9cf2-94e4052d7d88,35f9d6f9-e40b-4f51-9cf2-94e4052d7d88,"There is great interest in the restoration and conservation of coastal habitats for protection from flooding and erosion. This is evidenced by the growing number of analyses and reviews of the effectiveness of habitats as natural defences and increasing funding world-wide for nature-based defences–i.e. restoration projects aimed at coastal protection; yet, there is no synthetic information on what kinds of projects are effective and cost effective for this purpose. This paper addresses two issues critical for designing restoration projects for coastal protection: (i) a synthesis of the costs and benefits of projects designed for coastal protection (nature-based defences) and (ii) analyses of the effectiveness of coastal habitats (natural defences) in reducing wave heights and the biophysical parameters that influence this effectiveness. We (i) analyse data from sixty-nine field measurements in coastal habitats globally and examine measures of effectiveness of mangroves, salt-marshes, coral reefs and seagrass/kelp beds for wave height reduction; (ii) synthesise the costs and coastal protection benefits of fifty-two nature-based defence projects and; (iii) estimate the benefits of each restoration project by combining information on restoration costs with data from nearby field measurements. The analyses of field measurements show that coastal habitats have significant potential for reducing wave heights that varies by habitat and site. In general, coral reefs and salt-marshes have the highest overall potential. Habitat effectiveness is influenced by: a) the ratios of wave height-to-water depth and habitat width-to-wavelength in coral reefs; and b) the ratio of vegetation height-to-water depth in salt-marshes. The comparison of costs of nature-based defence projects and engineering structures show that salt-marshes and mangroves can be two to five times cheaper than a submerged breakwater for wave heights up to half a metre and, within their limits, become more cost effective at greater depths. Nature-based defence projects also report benefits ranging from reductions in storm damage to reductions in coastal structure costs.","Narayan, Siddharth; Beck, Michael W.; Reguero, Borja G.; Losada, Iñigo J.; van Wesenbeeck, Bregje; Pontee, Nigel; Sanchirico, James N.; Ingram, Jane Carter; Lange, Glenn-Marie; Burks-Copes, Kelly A.",10.1371/journal.pone.0154735,,,5,"PLOS ONE",e0154735,"The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences",,11,2016,26459,35f9d6f9-e40b-4f51-9cf2-94e4052d7d88,"Journal Article",/article/10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
/reference/37072456-2de9-47de-ad41-f6363df708e0,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/37072456-2de9-47de-ad41-f6363df708e0,37072456-2de9-47de-ad41-f6363df708e0,,"City of Los Angeles,",,,,,,,"One water LA [web site]",,,2018,26453,37072456-2de9-47de-ad41-f6363df708e0,"Web Page",/webpage/01e5735b-10eb-43ad-b47e-32d19cb69876
/reference/37e05b2c-e115-4d3f-a818-832f04942a5e,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/37e05b2c-e115-4d3f-a818-832f04942a5e,37e05b2c-e115-4d3f-a818-832f04942a5e,,"State of California,",,,,,,,"Planning for Sea-Level Rise Database  [web site]",,,2014,24197,37e05b2c-e115-4d3f-a818-832f04942a5e,"Web Page",/webpage/efeeef20-4a99-4d1f-98ee-43fd26112987
/reference/38bbcdca-4467-458b-9dc6-352c41f9ecfb,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/38bbcdca-4467-458b-9dc6-352c41f9ecfb,38bbcdca-4467-458b-9dc6-352c41f9ecfb,,"Wentz, Jessica A.",10.7916/D870812J,,,,"Environmental Law Reporter",11015-11031,"Assessing the impacts of climate change on the built environment: A framework for environmental reviews",,45,2015,24156,38bbcdca-4467-458b-9dc6-352c41f9ecfb,"Journal Article",/article/10.7916/D870812J
/reference/39e9e9c3-5af7-402e-8d1c-d5cbcda98736,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/39e9e9c3-5af7-402e-8d1c-d5cbcda98736,39e9e9c3-5af7-402e-8d1c-d5cbcda98736,,"Renn, O.",,,,,,,"Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World",,,2008,4049,39e9e9c3-5af7-402e-8d1c-d5cbcda98736,Book,/book/7f3c6fe3-c37b-46cb-8093-56bdf503270b
/reference/3bae2310-7572-47e2-99a4-9e4276764934,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/3bae2310-7572-47e2-99a4-9e4276764934,3bae2310-7572-47e2-99a4-9e4276764934,,"Sweet, W.V.; R. Horton; R.E. Kopp; A.N. LeGrande; A. Romanou",10.7930/J0VM49F2,,,,,333-363,"Sea Level Rise",,,2017,21570,3bae2310-7572-47e2-99a4-9e4276764934,"Book Section",/report/climate-science-special-report/chapter/sea-level-rise
/reference/3c3cc09b-c2d7-4c52-bf8f-c064efa78e93,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/3c3cc09b-c2d7-4c52-bf8f-c064efa78e93,3c3cc09b-c2d7-4c52-bf8f-c064efa78e93,,"Vogel, Jason; Karen M. Carney; Joel B. Smith; Charles Herrick; Missy Stults; Megan O’Grady; Alexis St. Juliana; Heather Hosterman; Lorine Giangola",,,,,,,"Climate Adaptation — The State of Practice in U.S. Communities",,,2016,22874,3c3cc09b-c2d7-4c52-bf8f-c064efa78e93,Report,/report/climate-adaptation-state-practice-us-communities
/reference/3d19f4a6-97fc-4217-ad50-ac4214e6191a,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/3d19f4a6-97fc-4217-ad50-ac4214e6191a,3d19f4a6-97fc-4217-ad50-ac4214e6191a,,"Pelling, Mark",,,,,,,"Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation",,,2010,23634,3d19f4a6-97fc-4217-ad50-ac4214e6191a,Book,/book/adaptation-climate-change-resilience-transformation
/reference/3df7d31f-d9ce-4eab-8db0-87937fd3111f,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/3df7d31f-d9ce-4eab-8db0-87937fd3111f,3df7d31f-d9ce-4eab-8db0-87937fd3111f,"The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) was established in 1990 to “assist the Nation and the world to understand, assess, predict, and respond to human-induced and natural processes of global change.”1 A key responsibility for the program is to conduct National Climate Assessments (NCAs) every 4 years.2 These assessments are intended to inform the nation about “observed changes in climate, the current status of the climate, and anticipated trends for the future.” The USGCRP hopes that government entities from federal agencies to small municipalities, citizens, communities, and businesses will rely on these assessments of climate- related risks for planning and decision-making. The third NCA (NCA3) was published in 2014 and work on the fourth is beginning. The USGCRP asked the Board on Environmental Change and Society of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a workshop to explore ways to frame the NCA4 and subsequent NCA reports in terms of risks to society. The workshop was intended to collect experienced views on how to characterize and communicate information about climate-related hazards, risks, and opportunities that will support decision makers in their efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce vulnerability to likely changes in climate, and increase resilience to those changes. Characterizing Risk in Climate Change Assessments summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop.","National Academies of Sciences Engineering & Medicine,",10.17226/23569,,,,,,"Characterizing Risk in Climate Change Assessments: Proceedings of a Workshop",,,2016,23652,3df7d31f-d9ce-4eab-8db0-87937fd3111f,Book,/book/characterizing-risk-climate-change-assessments-proceedings-workshop
/reference/3f6dbf56-0791-455d-ab97-24afdcc127a1,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/3f6dbf56-0791-455d-ab97-24afdcc127a1,3f6dbf56-0791-455d-ab97-24afdcc127a1,,"Lonsdale, K.; Pringle, P.; Turner, B. L.",,,,,,40,"Transformative adaptation: What it is, why it matters & what is needed",,,2015,26477,3f6dbf56-0791-455d-ab97-24afdcc127a1,Report,/report/transformative-adaptation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-what-is-needed
/reference/40cd1072-ac17-4dfa-ba98-a554bf1a0458,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/40cd1072-ac17-4dfa-ba98-a554bf1a0458,40cd1072-ac17-4dfa-ba98-a554bf1a0458,,"Burch, S.",10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009,,0959-3780,2,"Global Environmental Change",287-297,"Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada",,20,2010,1686,40cd1072-ac17-4dfa-ba98-a554bf1a0458,"Journal Article",/article/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
/reference/425c45e3-2450-48e1-8d9e-9580454ac2a8,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/425c45e3-2450-48e1-8d9e-9580454ac2a8,425c45e3-2450-48e1-8d9e-9580454ac2a8,"Social and ecological vulnerability to disasters and outcomes of any particular extreme event are influenced by buildup or erosion of resilience both before and after disasters occur. Resilient social-ecological systems incorporate diverse mechanisms for living with, and learning from, change and unexpected shocks. Disaster management requires multilevel governance systems that can enhance the capacity to cope with uncertainty and surprise by mobilizing diverse sources of resilience.","Adger, W. Neil; Hughes, Terry P.; Folke, Carl; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Rockström, Johan",10.1126/science.1112122,,,5737,Science,1036-1039,"Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters",,309,2005,24192,425c45e3-2450-48e1-8d9e-9580454ac2a8,"Journal Article",/article/10.1126/science.1112122
/reference/44dd3160-74d0-4173-8ca4-b503fcd93615,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/44dd3160-74d0-4173-8ca4-b503fcd93615,44dd3160-74d0-4173-8ca4-b503fcd93615,"In the face of a changing climate, many United States (US) local governments are creating plans to prepare. These plans layout how a community is vulnerable to existing and future changes in climate as well as what actions they propose taking to prepare. The actions included in these plans provide insight into what local governments feel they have the ability to undertake, as well as what actions they believe are important to building resilience. To date, little to no analysis has been conducted on the content of these plans, leaving researchers, practitioners, and those supporting communities with limited understanding of what gaps need to be filled or how best to support locally prioritized climate action. This paper analyzes the content of 43 stand alone climate adaptation plans from US local communities to identify the types of actions proposed and how those actions compare to what researchers indicate the communities should be prioritizing based on regional climate projections. The results indicate that local communities include numerous and varied actions in their adaptation plans and that the majority of communities are selecting actions that are theoretically appropriate given projected changes in regional climate. Yet some types of actions, such as building codes and advocacy, are not being widely used. These results contrast with previous studies, which found that local communities focus primarily on capacity building approaches. Findings also demonstrate that plans rarely contain significant details about how actions will be implemented, raising questions about whether plans will translate into real-world projects.","Stults, Missy; Woodruff, Sierra C.",10.1007/s11027-016-9725-9,"December 01",1573-1596,8,"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change",1249-1279,"Looking under the hood of local adaptation plans: Shedding light on the actions prioritized to build local resilience to climate change","journal article",22,2017,24168,44dd3160-74d0-4173-8ca4-b503fcd93615,"Journal Article",/article/10.1007/s11027-016-9725-9
/reference/4c92405f-7756-474c-b8d9-a251d29823ab,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/4c92405f-7756-474c-b8d9-a251d29823ab,4c92405f-7756-474c-b8d9-a251d29823ab,,"TCFD,",,,,,,66,"Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures",,,2017,24165,4c92405f-7756-474c-b8d9-a251d29823ab,Report,/report/final-report-recommendations-task-force-on-climate-related-financial-disclosures
/reference/4eee7d3c-08b0-4157-b709-86bf2d117793,https://data.globalchange.gov/reference/4eee7d3c-08b0-4157-b709-86bf2d117793,4eee7d3c-08b0-4157-b709-86bf2d117793,,"Haasnoot, Marjolijn; Kwakkel, Jan H.; Walker, Warren E.; ter Maat, Judith",10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006,2013/04/01/,0959-3780,2,"Global Environmental Change",485-498,"Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world",,23,2013,25878,4eee7d3c-08b0-4157-b709-86bf2d117793,"Journal Article",/article/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006