You are viewing /report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report/chapter/energy-systems/finding/key-message-3-1 in Turtle
Alternatives : HTML JSON YAML text N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
@prefix dcterms: <> .
@prefix xsd: <> .
@prefix gcis: <> .
@prefix cito: <> .
@prefix biro: <> .

   dcterms:identifier "key-message-3-1";
   gcis:findingNumber "3.1"^^xsd:string;
   gcis:findingStatement "In 2013, primary energy use in North America exceeded 125 exajoules (1), of which Canada was responsible for 11.9%, Mexico 6.5%, and the United States 81.6%. Of total primary energy sources, approximately 81% was from fossil fuels, which contributed to carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) (2) emissions levels, exceeding 1.76 petagrams of carbon, or about 20% of the global total for energy-related activities. Of these emissions, coal accounted for 28%, oil 44%, and natural gas 28% (<em>very high confidence, likely</em>).<br><br>\r\n<small>(1)  One exajoule is equal to one quintillion (1018) joules, a derived unit of energy in the International System of Units.<br>\r\n(2)  Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e): Amount of CO<sub>2</sub> that would produce the same effect on the radiative balance of Earth’s climate system as another greenhouse gas, such as methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) or nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), on a 100-year timescale. For comparison to units of carbon, each kg CO<sub>2</sub>e is equivalent to 0.273 kg C (0.273 = <sup>1</sup>⁄<sub>3</sub>.67). See Box P.2 in the Preface for more details.</small>"^^xsd:string;
   gcis:isFindingOf <>;
   gcis:isFindingOf <>;

## Properties of the finding:
   gcis:descriptionOfEvidenceBase "Data on energy use are collected by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (U.S. DOE) Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) International Energy Agency (IEA). Data for CO<sub>2</sub>e were accessed from a number of sources, including the EIA, IEA, U.S. DOE Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) database (Boden et al., 2016), and the World Resources Institute (WRI) CAIT database ( All data suggest similar trends, although the exact values differ."^^xsd:string;
   gcis:assessmentOfConfidenceBasedOnEvidence "There is very high confidence in the likelihood that the statement is based on consistent findings across the literature."^^xsd:string;
   gcis:newInformationAndRemainingUncertainties "These datasets include uncertainties related to the amount of fossil fuel used (i.e., typically identified through sales-weighted averages to create a national average) and the carbon and heat contents of the energy reserve (e.g., U.S. EPA 2017a). According to the literature, there are further uncertainties related to lost and fugitive emissions (Alvarez et al., 2012; Brandt et al., 2014; Karion et al., 2013; Pétron et al., 2014; Zavala-Araiza et al., 2015). Estimates of fugitive methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) levels indicate that these emissions are unlikely to substantially alter Key Finding 1 (Alvarez et al., 2012; Brandt et al., 2014). Fugitive CH<sub>4</sub> from oil, gas, and coal production and transportation is included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), U.S. DOE, Canadian, and Mexican inventories, but there may be further emissions not yet accounted. Furthermore, while the trends are consistent across data sources, the absolute values of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions levels from energy consumption and production vary across datasets because of differences in system boundary definitions, inclusion of industrial process emissions, emissions factors applied, and other issues."^^xsd:string;

   a gcis:Finding .

## This finding cites the following entities:

   prov:wasDerivedFrom <>.