- Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report
- Featured Publications
- All Publications
Alternatives : HTML JSON YAML text N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . @prefix gcis: <http://data.globalchange.gov/gcis.owl#> . @prefix cito: <http://purl.org/spar/cito/> . @prefix biro: <http://purl.org/spar/biro/> . <https://data.globalchange.gov/report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report/chapter/grasslands/finding/key-message-10-2> dcterms:identifier "key-message-10-2"; gcis:findingNumber "10.2"^^xsd:string; gcis:findingStatement "Increasing temperatures and rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations interact to increase productivity in northern North American grasslands, but this productivity response will be mediated by variable precipitation, soil moisture, and nutrient availability (<em>high confidence, very likely</em>)."^^xsd:string; gcis:isFindingOf <https://data.globalchange.gov/report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report/chapter/grasslands>; gcis:isFindingOf <https://data.globalchange.gov/report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report>; ## Properties of the finding: gcis:descriptionOfEvidenceBase "Experimental manipulations in the field provide evidence of climate change effects on grassland productivity by up to 33%, but this is contingent on nutrient and moisture availability (e.g., Morgan et al., 2011; Mueller et al., 2016; Reich and Hobbie 2013). Spatially distributed observations of vegetation phenology (i.e., greenness) and carbon fluxes combined with empirical modeling provide evidence of regional differences in grassland responses to future climate change (Hufkens et al., 2016). Simulation models are in general agreement with empirical evidence that carbon stocks will increase in grasslands in the coming three to four decades (Zhu et al., 2011). In grasslands, carbon uptake is responsive to precipitation amount and event size and timing, with both positive and negative effects documented, but droughts are associated with carbon losses across all grasslands (Cherwin and Knapp 2012; Goldstein and Suding 2014; Heisler-White et al., 2008, 2009; Knapp et al., 2008b; Kulmatiski and Beard 2013; Thomey et al., 2011)."^^xsd:string; gcis:newInformationAndRemainingUncertainties "The largest source of uncertainty is related to future precipitation regimes in the grassland biomes of North America, with both increases and decreases in precipitation predicted (IPCC 2013). The degree to which altered precipitation regimes will affect carbon cycling in future grasslands is uncertain (Knapp et al., 2008b). The relative response of grassland productivity to moisture availability is contingent upon prior conditions, which vary temporally and spatially (Heisler-White et al., 2009). Empirical models represent grassland phenology and productivity well, but they lack explicit physiological processes, leading to uncertainties in mechanisms underlying ecosystem responses to climate change (Hufkens et al., 2016)."^^xsd:string; a gcis:Finding . ## This finding cites the following entities: <https://data.globalchange.gov/report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report/chapter/grasslands/finding/key-message-10-2> prov:wasDerivedFrom <https://data.globalchange.gov/report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report/chapter/preface/figure/figurep-4>.