You are viewing /report/second-state-carbon-cycle-report-soccr2-sustained-assessment-report/chapter/inland-waters/finding/key-message-14-2 in Turtle
Alternatives : HTML JSON YAML text N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
@prefix dcterms: <> .
@prefix xsd: <> .
@prefix gcis: <> .
@prefix cito: <> .
@prefix biro: <> .

   dcterms:identifier "key-message-14-2";
   gcis:findingNumber "14.2"^^xsd:string;
   gcis:findingStatement "Based on estimates presented herein, the carbon flux from inland waters is now understood to be four times larger than estimates presented in SOCCR1. The total flux of carbon from inland waters across North America is estimated to be 507 Tg C per year based on a modeling approach that integrates high-resolution U.S. data and continental-scale estimates of water area, discharge, and carbon emissions. This estimate represents a weighted average of 24 grams of carbon per m<sup>2</sup> per year of continental area exported and removed through inland waters in North America (<em>low confidence</em>)."^^xsd:string;
   gcis:isFindingOf <>;
   gcis:isFindingOf <>;

## Properties of the finding:
   gcis:descriptionOfEvidenceBase "Initial data presented in SOCCR1 did not acknowledge emission of carbon across the air-water interface. The estimate of 507 Tg C per year is based on well-constrained estimates of water discharge presented in Mayorga et al. (2010), Seitzinger et al. (2005), and compared with Dai et al. (2009, 2012). Estimates for the export of carbon modeled with water discharge are provided through the Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP) effort of the Global Carbon Project. Gaseous emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> are presented in Raymond et al. (2013) based on similar methods presented in Butman and Raymond (2011). Areal rates of carbon flux through inland waters for CONUS and Alaska match those for North America."^^xsd:string;
   gcis:assessmentOfConfidenceBasedOnEvidence "Overall level of confidence is lower for the region of North America due to the different modeling approach, lack of data that exist in both Canada and Mexico, and the simplified application of U.S. data to a region that covers many different ecosystem types."^^xsd:string;
   gcis:newInformationAndRemainingUncertainties "Estimates and uncertainties to scale the emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> from streams, rivers, and lake systems from CONUS to North America have already been provided. However, the application of CONUS lake carbon burial rates derived from Clow et al. (2015) to the total lake areas from Aufdenkampe et al. (2011) is unique. The methods used an average burial rate of about 110 g C per m per year, which is lower than those used in recent global estimates for lake and reservoir burial (Battin et al., 2009a). This burial rate is not dynamic and does not fully capture the spatial heterogeneity found across North America (Clow et al., 2015)."^^xsd:string;

   a gcis:Finding .

## This finding cites the following entities:

   prov:wasDerivedFrom <>.